Review



anti mouse cd206 antibody  (Elabscience Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Elabscience Biotechnology is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Elabscience Biotechnology manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Elabscience Biotechnology anti mouse cd206 antibody
    LA released from T-gel degradation induces macrophage M2 polarization and promotes fibroblast activation and collagen production. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the association between T-gel degradation products and macrophage M2 polarization ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. (B) RNA-seq analysis of M2 macrophage marker expression in tissues one week after ID and SC injection of T-gel. (C–D) Immunofluorescence analysis of <t>CD206</t> (C) and FAPα (D) expression in tissues ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (E) Schematic diagram of the co-culture system showing RAW264.7 macrophages pretreated with T-gel extract medium that were subsequently co-cultured with L929 fibroblasts. (F–G) Collagen expression in L929 cells from the co-culture system assessed by Western blot (F) and ELISA (G). “C” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with blank medium; “T” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with T-gel extract medium. n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01. (H) ELISA analysis of TGFβ expression in RAW264.7 cells treated with T-gel extract medium ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (I) Schematic representation of LA, released during T-gel degradation, programming macrophages toward an M2 phenotype and subsequently promoting fibroblast activation and collagen secretion.
    Anti Mouse Cd206 Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 58 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+antibody/PE+Anti-Mouse+CD206%2FMMR+Antibody/pmc13091142-309-8-11
    Average 95 stars, based on 58 article reviews
    anti mouse cd206 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Injection site dictates the immune response to a biodegradable polymer and corresponding collagen regeneration"

    Article Title: Injection site dictates the immune response to a biodegradable polymer and corresponding collagen regeneration

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.04.004

    LA released from T-gel degradation induces macrophage M2 polarization and promotes fibroblast activation and collagen production. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the association between T-gel degradation products and macrophage M2 polarization ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. (B) RNA-seq analysis of M2 macrophage marker expression in tissues one week after ID and SC injection of T-gel. (C–D) Immunofluorescence analysis of CD206 (C) and FAPα (D) expression in tissues ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (E) Schematic diagram of the co-culture system showing RAW264.7 macrophages pretreated with T-gel extract medium that were subsequently co-cultured with L929 fibroblasts. (F–G) Collagen expression in L929 cells from the co-culture system assessed by Western blot (F) and ELISA (G). “C” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with blank medium; “T” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with T-gel extract medium. n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01. (H) ELISA analysis of TGFβ expression in RAW264.7 cells treated with T-gel extract medium ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (I) Schematic representation of LA, released during T-gel degradation, programming macrophages toward an M2 phenotype and subsequently promoting fibroblast activation and collagen secretion.
    Figure Legend Snippet: LA released from T-gel degradation induces macrophage M2 polarization and promotes fibroblast activation and collagen production. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the association between T-gel degradation products and macrophage M2 polarization ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. (B) RNA-seq analysis of M2 macrophage marker expression in tissues one week after ID and SC injection of T-gel. (C–D) Immunofluorescence analysis of CD206 (C) and FAPα (D) expression in tissues ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (E) Schematic diagram of the co-culture system showing RAW264.7 macrophages pretreated with T-gel extract medium that were subsequently co-cultured with L929 fibroblasts. (F–G) Collagen expression in L929 cells from the co-culture system assessed by Western blot (F) and ELISA (G). “C” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with blank medium; “T” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with T-gel extract medium. n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01. (H) ELISA analysis of TGFβ expression in RAW264.7 cells treated with T-gel extract medium ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (I) Schematic representation of LA, released during T-gel degradation, programming macrophages toward an M2 phenotype and subsequently promoting fibroblast activation and collagen secretion.

    Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Flow Cytometry, RNA Sequencing, Marker, Expressing, Injection, Immunofluorescence, Co-Culture Assay, Cell Culture, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay



    Similar Products

    95
    Elabscience Biotechnology anti mouse cd206 antibody
    LA released from T-gel degradation induces macrophage M2 polarization and promotes fibroblast activation and collagen production. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the association between T-gel degradation products and macrophage M2 polarization ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. (B) RNA-seq analysis of M2 macrophage marker expression in tissues one week after ID and SC injection of T-gel. (C–D) Immunofluorescence analysis of <t>CD206</t> (C) and FAPα (D) expression in tissues ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (E) Schematic diagram of the co-culture system showing RAW264.7 macrophages pretreated with T-gel extract medium that were subsequently co-cultured with L929 fibroblasts. (F–G) Collagen expression in L929 cells from the co-culture system assessed by Western blot (F) and ELISA (G). “C” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with blank medium; “T” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with T-gel extract medium. n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01. (H) ELISA analysis of TGFβ expression in RAW264.7 cells treated with T-gel extract medium ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (I) Schematic representation of LA, released during T-gel degradation, programming macrophages toward an M2 phenotype and subsequently promoting fibroblast activation and collagen secretion.
    Anti Mouse Cd206 Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+antibody/PE+Anti-Mouse+CD206%2FMMR+Antibody/pmc13091142-309-8-11
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse cd206 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    R&D Systems anti cd206
    LA released from T-gel degradation induces macrophage M2 polarization and promotes fibroblast activation and collagen production. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the association between T-gel degradation products and macrophage M2 polarization ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. (B) RNA-seq analysis of M2 macrophage marker expression in tissues one week after ID and SC injection of T-gel. (C–D) Immunofluorescence analysis of <t>CD206</t> (C) and FAPα (D) expression in tissues ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (E) Schematic diagram of the co-culture system showing RAW264.7 macrophages pretreated with T-gel extract medium that were subsequently co-cultured with L929 fibroblasts. (F–G) Collagen expression in L929 cells from the co-culture system assessed by Western blot (F) and ELISA (G). “C” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with blank medium; “T” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with T-gel extract medium. n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01. (H) ELISA analysis of TGFβ expression in RAW264.7 cells treated with T-gel extract medium ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (I) Schematic representation of LA, released during T-gel degradation, programming macrophages toward an M2 phenotype and subsequently promoting fibroblast activation and collagen secretion.
    Anti Cd206, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+antibody/Mouse+MMR%2FCD206+Antibody/pmc13108569-265-123-126
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bio-Rad cd206
    A: Representative histological (H & E) and immunofluorescence images of TA muscle cross-sections at day 1 post-injury following treatment with vehicle (VEH), indomethacin (INDO), aspirin (ASA), or a combination of INDO + ASA. Sections are stained for Ly6G (neutrophils, red), CD68 (total macrophages, green), <t>CD206</t> (M2-like macrophages, red), with DAPI (nuclei, blue) and Laminin (LAM, white) to visualize fiber boundaries. B-E : Quantification of day 1 post-injury inflammatory markers including Ly6G + cell density ( B ), CD68 + cell density ( C ), the ratio of Ly6G + to total CD68 + cells ( D ), and the M1/M2 macrophage ratio ( E ). F: Representative H & E and immunofluorescence images at day 3 post-injury for the same treatment groups and markers. G-J: Quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell dynamics at day 3 post-injury, including Ly6G + cell density ( G ), CD68 + cell area as a percentage of total tissue ( H ), CD206 + cell densities ( I ), and the M1/M2 ratio ( J ). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. Groups labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another, while groups sharing a common letter are not significantly different.
    Cd206, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+antibody/Rat+anti+Mouse+Gr-1/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__21__719989-90-39-40
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Elabscience Biotechnology pe cyanine 7 cd206
    A: Representative histological (H & E) and immunofluorescence images of TA muscle cross-sections at day 1 post-injury following treatment with vehicle (VEH), indomethacin (INDO), aspirin (ASA), or a combination of INDO + ASA. Sections are stained for Ly6G (neutrophils, red), CD68 (total macrophages, green), <t>CD206</t> (M2-like macrophages, red), with DAPI (nuclei, blue) and Laminin (LAM, white) to visualize fiber boundaries. B-E : Quantification of day 1 post-injury inflammatory markers including Ly6G + cell density ( B ), CD68 + cell density ( C ), the ratio of Ly6G + to total CD68 + cells ( D ), and the M1/M2 macrophage ratio ( E ). F: Representative H & E and immunofluorescence images at day 3 post-injury for the same treatment groups and markers. G-J: Quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell dynamics at day 3 post-injury, including Ly6G + cell density ( G ), CD68 + cell area as a percentage of total tissue ( H ), CD206 + cell densities ( I ), and the M1/M2 ratio ( J ). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. Groups labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another, while groups sharing a common letter are not significantly different.
    Pe Cyanine 7 Cd206, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+antibody/PE%2FCyanine7+Anti-Mouse+CD206%2FMMR+Antibody/pm41996989-66-30-35
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pe cyanine 7 cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Elabscience Biotechnology apc anti mouse cd206 mmr antibody
    A: Representative histological (H & E) and immunofluorescence images of TA muscle cross-sections at day 1 post-injury following treatment with vehicle (VEH), indomethacin (INDO), aspirin (ASA), or a combination of INDO + ASA. Sections are stained for Ly6G (neutrophils, red), CD68 (total macrophages, green), <t>CD206</t> (M2-like macrophages, red), with DAPI (nuclei, blue) and Laminin (LAM, white) to visualize fiber boundaries. B-E : Quantification of day 1 post-injury inflammatory markers including Ly6G + cell density ( B ), CD68 + cell density ( C ), the ratio of Ly6G + to total CD68 + cells ( D ), and the M1/M2 macrophage ratio ( E ). F: Representative H & E and immunofluorescence images at day 3 post-injury for the same treatment groups and markers. G-J: Quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell dynamics at day 3 post-injury, including Ly6G + cell density ( G ), CD68 + cell area as a percentage of total tissue ( H ), CD206 + cell densities ( I ), and the M1/M2 ratio ( J ). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. Groups labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another, while groups sharing a common letter are not significantly different.
    Apc Anti Mouse Cd206 Mmr Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+antibody/APC+Anti-Mouse+CD206%2FMMR+Antibody/pm41961300-97-47-51
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    apc anti mouse cd206 mmr antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    R&D Systems anti mmr cd206
    A: Representative histological (H & E) and immunofluorescence images of TA muscle cross-sections at day 1 post-injury following treatment with vehicle (VEH), indomethacin (INDO), aspirin (ASA), or a combination of INDO + ASA. Sections are stained for Ly6G (neutrophils, red), CD68 (total macrophages, green), <t>CD206</t> (M2-like macrophages, red), with DAPI (nuclei, blue) and Laminin (LAM, white) to visualize fiber boundaries. B-E : Quantification of day 1 post-injury inflammatory markers including Ly6G + cell density ( B ), CD68 + cell density ( C ), the ratio of Ly6G + to total CD68 + cells ( D ), and the M1/M2 macrophage ratio ( E ). F: Representative H & E and immunofluorescence images at day 3 post-injury for the same treatment groups and markers. G-J: Quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell dynamics at day 3 post-injury, including Ly6G + cell density ( G ), CD68 + cell area as a percentage of total tissue ( H ), CD206 + cell densities ( I ), and the M1/M2 ratio ( J ). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. Groups labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another, while groups sharing a common letter are not significantly different.
    Anti Mmr Cd206, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+antibody/Mouse+MMR%2FCD206+Antibody/pm41916966-298-77-79
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mmr cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    R&D Systems goat polyclonal antibodies against cd206
    A: Representative histological (H & E) and immunofluorescence images of TA muscle cross-sections at day 1 post-injury following treatment with vehicle (VEH), indomethacin (INDO), aspirin (ASA), or a combination of INDO + ASA. Sections are stained for Ly6G (neutrophils, red), CD68 (total macrophages, green), <t>CD206</t> (M2-like macrophages, red), with DAPI (nuclei, blue) and Laminin (LAM, white) to visualize fiber boundaries. B-E : Quantification of day 1 post-injury inflammatory markers including Ly6G + cell density ( B ), CD68 + cell density ( C ), the ratio of Ly6G + to total CD68 + cells ( D ), and the M1/M2 macrophage ratio ( E ). F: Representative H & E and immunofluorescence images at day 3 post-injury for the same treatment groups and markers. G-J: Quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell dynamics at day 3 post-injury, including Ly6G + cell density ( G ), CD68 + cell area as a percentage of total tissue ( H ), CD206 + cell densities ( I ), and the M1/M2 ratio ( J ). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. Groups labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another, while groups sharing a common letter are not significantly different.
    Goat Polyclonal Antibodies Against Cd206, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+antibody/Mouse+MMR%2FCD206+Antibody/10__1016_slash_j__xjidi__2026__100475-142-80-85
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    goat polyclonal antibodies against cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    R&D Systems anti sox10
    A: Representative histological (H & E) and immunofluorescence images of TA muscle cross-sections at day 1 post-injury following treatment with vehicle (VEH), indomethacin (INDO), aspirin (ASA), or a combination of INDO + ASA. Sections are stained for Ly6G (neutrophils, red), CD68 (total macrophages, green), <t>CD206</t> (M2-like macrophages, red), with DAPI (nuclei, blue) and Laminin (LAM, white) to visualize fiber boundaries. B-E : Quantification of day 1 post-injury inflammatory markers including Ly6G + cell density ( B ), CD68 + cell density ( C ), the ratio of Ly6G + to total CD68 + cells ( D ), and the M1/M2 macrophage ratio ( E ). F: Representative H & E and immunofluorescence images at day 3 post-injury for the same treatment groups and markers. G-J: Quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell dynamics at day 3 post-injury, including Ly6G + cell density ( G ), CD68 + cell area as a percentage of total tissue ( H ), CD206 + cell densities ( I ), and the M1/M2 ratio ( J ). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. Groups labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another, while groups sharing a common letter are not significantly different.
    Anti Sox10, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+antibody/Mouse+MMR%2FCD206+Antibody/pm41922778-651-121-124
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti sox10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    LA released from T-gel degradation induces macrophage M2 polarization and promotes fibroblast activation and collagen production. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the association between T-gel degradation products and macrophage M2 polarization ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. (B) RNA-seq analysis of M2 macrophage marker expression in tissues one week after ID and SC injection of T-gel. (C–D) Immunofluorescence analysis of CD206 (C) and FAPα (D) expression in tissues ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (E) Schematic diagram of the co-culture system showing RAW264.7 macrophages pretreated with T-gel extract medium that were subsequently co-cultured with L929 fibroblasts. (F–G) Collagen expression in L929 cells from the co-culture system assessed by Western blot (F) and ELISA (G). “C” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with blank medium; “T” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with T-gel extract medium. n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01. (H) ELISA analysis of TGFβ expression in RAW264.7 cells treated with T-gel extract medium ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (I) Schematic representation of LA, released during T-gel degradation, programming macrophages toward an M2 phenotype and subsequently promoting fibroblast activation and collagen secretion.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Injection site dictates the immune response to a biodegradable polymer and corresponding collagen regeneration

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.04.004

    Figure Lengend Snippet: LA released from T-gel degradation induces macrophage M2 polarization and promotes fibroblast activation and collagen production. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the association between T-gel degradation products and macrophage M2 polarization ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. (B) RNA-seq analysis of M2 macrophage marker expression in tissues one week after ID and SC injection of T-gel. (C–D) Immunofluorescence analysis of CD206 (C) and FAPα (D) expression in tissues ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (E) Schematic diagram of the co-culture system showing RAW264.7 macrophages pretreated with T-gel extract medium that were subsequently co-cultured with L929 fibroblasts. (F–G) Collagen expression in L929 cells from the co-culture system assessed by Western blot (F) and ELISA (G). “C” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with blank medium; “T” represents RAW264.7 pretreated with T-gel extract medium. n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01. (H) ELISA analysis of TGFβ expression in RAW264.7 cells treated with T-gel extract medium ( n = 3, data represent mean ± s.d.). ∗∗P < 0.01. (I) Schematic representation of LA, released during T-gel degradation, programming macrophages toward an M2 phenotype and subsequently promoting fibroblast activation and collagen secretion.

    Article Snippet: Following permeabilization, cells were stained with Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-mouse CD206 antibody (Elabscience, E-AB-F1135D) for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Flow Cytometry, RNA Sequencing, Marker, Expressing, Injection, Immunofluorescence, Co-Culture Assay, Cell Culture, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    A: Representative histological (H & E) and immunofluorescence images of TA muscle cross-sections at day 1 post-injury following treatment with vehicle (VEH), indomethacin (INDO), aspirin (ASA), or a combination of INDO + ASA. Sections are stained for Ly6G (neutrophils, red), CD68 (total macrophages, green), CD206 (M2-like macrophages, red), with DAPI (nuclei, blue) and Laminin (LAM, white) to visualize fiber boundaries. B-E : Quantification of day 1 post-injury inflammatory markers including Ly6G + cell density ( B ), CD68 + cell density ( C ), the ratio of Ly6G + to total CD68 + cells ( D ), and the M1/M2 macrophage ratio ( E ). F: Representative H & E and immunofluorescence images at day 3 post-injury for the same treatment groups and markers. G-J: Quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell dynamics at day 3 post-injury, including Ly6G + cell density ( G ), CD68 + cell area as a percentage of total tissue ( H ), CD206 + cell densities ( I ), and the M1/M2 ratio ( J ). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. Groups labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another, while groups sharing a common letter are not significantly different.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Aspirin hastens resolution of skeletal muscle inflammation and promotes recovery of muscle strength following acute injury

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.21.719989

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A: Representative histological (H & E) and immunofluorescence images of TA muscle cross-sections at day 1 post-injury following treatment with vehicle (VEH), indomethacin (INDO), aspirin (ASA), or a combination of INDO + ASA. Sections are stained for Ly6G (neutrophils, red), CD68 (total macrophages, green), CD206 (M2-like macrophages, red), with DAPI (nuclei, blue) and Laminin (LAM, white) to visualize fiber boundaries. B-E : Quantification of day 1 post-injury inflammatory markers including Ly6G + cell density ( B ), CD68 + cell density ( C ), the ratio of Ly6G + to total CD68 + cells ( D ), and the M1/M2 macrophage ratio ( E ). F: Representative H & E and immunofluorescence images at day 3 post-injury for the same treatment groups and markers. G-J: Quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell dynamics at day 3 post-injury, including Ly6G + cell density ( G ), CD68 + cell area as a percentage of total tissue ( H ), CD206 + cell densities ( I ), and the M1/M2 ratio ( J ). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák post hoc tests. Groups labeled with different letters are significantly different from one another, while groups sharing a common letter are not significantly different.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used include MyHC type I [Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), BA-D5c, 1:100], MyHC type IIA (DSHB, SC-71c, 1:100), MyHC type IIB (DSHB, BF-F3c, 1:100), eMHC (DSHB, F1.652s, 1:20), Ly6G (GR1) (Bio-Rad, MCA2387, 1:50), CD68 (Bio-Rad, MCA1957, 1:200), CD206 (Bio-Rad, MCA2387, 1:50), and laminin (Abcam, ab7463, 1:200).

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Labeling